In Atomfall, the Core i7-3540M is slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3540M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 08, 2013
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3540M vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3540M vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3540M vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3540M
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
4 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3540M Jan 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
