In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3540M is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-10700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3540M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700KF
- Up to 44% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 44% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2013
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3540M vs Core i7-10700KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3540M vs Core i7-10700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3540M vs Core i7-10700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3540M
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3540M Jan 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
