In Atomfall, the Core i7-3540M is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3540M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2013
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3540M vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3540M vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3540M vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3540M
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3540M Jan 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
