In Atomfall, the Core i7-3520M is slower than the Core i3-14100. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $95 cheaper!
Core i7-3520M
- Up to 64% cheaper – $53.99 vs $149.35
- Up to 64% cheaper
- Up to 57% better value in Atomfall – $0.28 vs $0.65/FPS
- Up to 57% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 35 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Core i3-14100
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 229 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3520M vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3520M
Jun 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
190 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
83%
Price, $
$53.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
36%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
43%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3520M vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3520M vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3520M
Jun 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
77%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3520M Jun 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
