In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i7-3517U is slightly slower than the Core i5-6500T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3517U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Core i5-6500T
- Up to 4% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 97 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 3 years and 28 days newer – Jul 02, 2015 vs Jun 03, 2012
- Is 3 years and 28 days newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3517U vs Core i5-6500T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
97 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
70 FPS
100%
Price, $
$198.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3517U vs Core i5-6500T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3517U vs Core i5-6500T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3517U
Jun 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
97%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3517U Jun 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-6500T Jul 2nd, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1151 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
