In Deathloop, the Core i7-3517U is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3517U
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – Jun 03, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Core i3-330M
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 225 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-3517U vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
225 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3517U vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3517U vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3517U
Jun 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3517U Jun 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGAG1 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
