In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2960XM is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 5 5600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2960XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 5600X
- Up to 59% faster in Battlefield 6 – 97 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 59% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Sep 04, 2011
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2960XM vs Ryzen 5 5600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 5600X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
97 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
73 FPS
100%
Price, $
$223.5
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2960XM vs Ryzen 5 5600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2960XM vs Ryzen 5 5600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2960XM
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Ryzen 5 5600X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2960XM Sep 4th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 5600X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| $1,096.00 | MSRP | $299.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM4 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
