In Atomfall, the Core i7-2960XM is slower than the Core i9-14900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2960XM
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 04, 2011
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-2960XM vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$452.68
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2960XM vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2960XM vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2960XM
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2960XM Sep 4th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| $1,096.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
