In Atomfall, the Core i7-2960XM is slower than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2960XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 233 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 04, 2011
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-2960XM vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2960XM vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2960XM vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2960XM
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2960XM Sep 4th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $1,096.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
