In DOOM Eternal, the Core i7-2960XM is slightly slower than the Core i3-10105F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2960XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 1% faster in DOOM Eternal – 789 vs 780 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in DOOM Eternal
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 04, 2011
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer
DOOM Eternal FPS Calculator
Core i7-2960XM vs Core i3-10105F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
789 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
531 FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2960XM vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2960XM vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2960XM
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2960XM Sep 4th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $1,096.00 | MSRP | $97.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1200 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
