The Core i7-2960XM is a much slower gaming CPU than the Athlon 200GE. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-2960XM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Athlon 200GE
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
Core i7-2960XM vs Athlon 200GE for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-2960XM
Sep 4th, 2011
Average FPS
108
87%
Min 1% FPS
65
82%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Athlon 200GE
Sep 6th, 2018
Average FPS
124
100%
Min 1% FPS
79
100%
Price, $
$69.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Core i7-2960XM vs Athlon 200GE in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2960XM vs Athlon 200GE in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2960XM vs Athlon 200GE in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2960XM
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Athlon 200GE
Sep 6th, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-2960XM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
$1,096.00 | MSRP | $55.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zen |
55 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |