The Core i7-2920XM is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-950. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 55 vs 130 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i7-950
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-2920XM vs Core i7-950 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-2920XM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Average FPS
166
99%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, $
$84.15
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Core i7-2920XM vs Core i7-950 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2920XM vs Core i7-950 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2920XM vs Core i7-950 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2920XM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.07 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.33 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-2920XM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-950 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
$1,096.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
55 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |