In Atomfall, the Core i7-2820QM is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 9950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 45 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
- Up to 41% faster in Atomfall – 268 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 41% faster in Atomfall
- Is 14 years and 3 days newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 14 years and 3 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-2820QM vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
268 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
201 FPS
100%
Price, $
$675.59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2820QM vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2820QM vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2820QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
60%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2820QM Jan 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9950X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $699.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM5 |
45W | Power Consumption | 170W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
