In Deathloop, the Core i7-2820QM is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop – 241 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop
- Is 14 years and 4 days newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 14 years and 4 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-2820QM vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2820QM vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2820QM vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2820QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
64%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2820QM Jan 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1851 |
45W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
