In Atomfall, the Core i7-2820QM is slower than the Core i7-14700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core i7-14700K
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-2820QM vs Core i7-14700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$432.96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2820QM vs Core i7-14700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2820QM vs Core i7-14700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2820QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
61%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2820QM Jan 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
45W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
