Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-2820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4040 days newer than Core i7-2820QM.
Advantages of Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 45 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i7-2820QM - 124 vs 110 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2820QM | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |