In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-2760QM is faster than the Core Ultra 9 285K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2760QM
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 196 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285K
- Is 13 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 04, 2011
- Is 13 years and 1 month newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-2760QM vs Core Ultra 9 285K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
171 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
87%
Price, $
$505.16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.95/FPS
100%
![Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Tetracosa-core [24 Core] 3.70 GHz Processor - OEM Pack - Box](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0DFKC99VL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2760QM vs Core Ultra 9 285K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2760QM vs Core Ultra 9 285K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2760QM
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
61%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2760QM Sep 4th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | LGA1851 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
