In Atomfall, the Core i7-2760QM is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2760QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Core i5-9400
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 04, 2011
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-2760QM vs Core i5-9400: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2760QM vs Core i5-9400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2760QM vs Core i5-9400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2760QM
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
85%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2760QM Sep 4th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400 Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | LGA1151 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
