In Deathloop, the Core i7-2720QM is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2720QM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 45 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Up to 16% faster in Deathloop – 256 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-2720QM vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2720QM vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2720QM vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2720QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
59%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2720QM Jan 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM5 |
45W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
