In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-2675QM is faster than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2675QM
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 196 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Is 12 years and 5 days newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 12 years and 5 days newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-2675QM vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
170 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
86%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2675QM vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2675QM vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2675QM
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
52%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2675QM Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
