In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2670QM is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2670QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 45 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 70% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 70% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 24 days newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 9 years and 24 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2670QM vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
104 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2670QM vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2670QM vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2670QM
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
65%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2670QM Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM4 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
