In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2670QM is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2670QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 48% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 48% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2670QM vs Core i9-10900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
90 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
67 FPS
100%
Price, $
$439
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2670QM vs Core i9-10900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2670QM vs Core i9-10900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2670QM
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
58%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2670QM Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $509.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1200 |
45W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
