In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2635QM is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-9900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 45 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6 – 86 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 5 days newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 8 years and 5 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2635QM vs Core i9-9900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.63/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2635QM vs Core i9-9900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2635QM vs Core i9-9900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2635QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
58%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2635QM Jan 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $488.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | LGA1151 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
