In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-2630QM is faster than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2630QM
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Is 14 years and 12 days newer – Jan 15, 2025 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 14 years and 12 days newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-2630QM vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 15th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
85%
Price, $
$560
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.29/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2630QM vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2630QM vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2630QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
52%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 15th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2630QM Jan 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 15th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Released | Jan 15th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1851 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
