The Core i7-2600S is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Pentium G3258, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $80.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-2600S
- Up to 67% cheaper – $39.00 vs $119.01
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Pentium G3258
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 53 vs 65 Watts
Core i7-2600S vs Pentium G3258 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-2600S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
169
99%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Pentium G3258
Jun 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, $
$119.01
32%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
33%
Core i7-2600S vs Pentium G3258 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600S vs Pentium G3258 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600S vs Pentium G3258 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Pentium G3258
Jun 2nd, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-2600S | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
65 W | Power Consumption | 53 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1333 MHz |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |