In Control, the Core i7-2600S is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $56 cheaper!
Core i7-2600S
- Up to 20% cheaper – $229.95 vs $286.00
- Up to 20% cheaper
- Up to 17% better value in Control – $0.93 vs $1.12/FPS
- Up to 17% better value in Control
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 3% faster in Control – 254 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Control
- Is 13 years and 11 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 13 years and 11 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-2600S vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-2600S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
246 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
96%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$286
80%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
83%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600S vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600S vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2600S Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
