In Atomfall, the Core i7-2600S is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $0 more expensive!
Core i7-2600S
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 27% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 27% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 0% cheaper – $229.89 vs $229.95
- Up to 0% cheaper
- Up to 22% better value in Atomfall – $0.93 vs $1.19/FPS
- Up to 22% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-2600S vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-2600S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
193 FPS
79%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
78%
Price, $
$229.95
99%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
78%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600S vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600S vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
8 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2600S Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
