In Rust, the Core i7-2600S is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $16 cheaper!
Core i7-2600S
- Up to 6% cheaper – $229.95 vs $245.81
- Up to 6% cheaper
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 10% faster in Rust – 232 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 3% better value in Rust – $1.05 vs $1.08/FPS
- Up to 3% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-2600S vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-2600S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
211 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
43 FPS
73%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
97%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
232 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
100%
Price, $
$245.81
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600S vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600S vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2600S Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
