In Ready or Not, the Core i7-2600S is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $15 cheaper!
Core i7-2600S
- Up to 6% cheaper – $229.95 vs $245.00
- Up to 6% cheaper
- Up to 3% better value in Ready or Not – $0.74 vs $0.76/FPS
- Up to 3% better value in Ready or Not
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 4% faster in Ready or Not – 319 vs 308 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Ready or Not
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
Ready or Not FPS Calculator
Core i7-2600S vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-2600S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
308 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
80 FPS
77%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
319 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
104 FPS
100%
Price, $
$245
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
97%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600S vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600S vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2600S Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
