In Atomfall, the Core i7-2600K is slightly faster than the Xeon E5520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2600K
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 193 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Jan 09, 2011 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 80 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-2600K vs Xeon E5520: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
193 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600K vs Xeon E5520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600K vs Xeon E5520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2600K Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| $317.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
