In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2600K is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2600K
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-12900F
- Up to 87% faster in Battlefield 6 – 116 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 87% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2600K vs Core i9-12900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
62 FPS
53%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
53%
Price, $
$249.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.03/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600K vs Core i9-12900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600K vs Core i9-12900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i9-12900F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2600K Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
$317.00 | MSRP | $494.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
