In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-2600K is slightly slower than the Celeron G3930 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $221 more expensive!
Core i7-2600K
No clear advantages
Celeron G3930
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 196 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 88% cheaper – $29.00 vs $249.95
- Up to 88% cheaper
- Up to 89% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.14 vs $1.30/FPS
- Up to 89% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 51 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-2600K vs Celeron G3930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
191 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
97%
Price, $
$249.95
11%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
11%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
196 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
100%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600K vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600K vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2600K Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $317.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 610 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
