In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2600 is much slower than the Core i9-14900K and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $225 cheaper!
Core i7-2600
- Up to 50% cheaper – $227.47 vs $452.68
- Up to 50% cheaper
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 119% faster in Battlefield 6 – 136 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 119% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 9% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.32 vs $3.66/FPS
- Up to 9% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2600 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-2600
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
62 FPS
46%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
45%
Price, $
$227.47
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.66/FPS
91%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$452.68
50%
Value, $/FPS
$3.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2600 Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
