In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2600 is much slower than the Core i9-13900K. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $321 cheaper!
Core i7-2600
- Up to 59% cheaper – $227.47 vs $548.89
- Up to 59% cheaper
- Up to 11% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.66 vs $4.12/FPS
- Up to 11% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 115% faster in Battlefield 6 – 133 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 115% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2600 vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-2600
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
62 FPS
47%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
46%
Price, $
$227.47
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.66/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
133 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
100%
Price, $
$548.89
41%
Value, $/FPS
$4.12/FPS
89%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
66%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2600 Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
