In Atomfall, the Core i7-2600 is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2600
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 221 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-2600 vs Core i9-10900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-2600
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
192 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
87%
Price, $
$226.37
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600 vs Core i9-10900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600 vs Core i9-10900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2600 Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $509.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
