In Atomfall, the Core i7-2600 is slower than the Core i7-14700K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $181 cheaper!
Core i7-2600
- Up to 45% cheaper – $224.80 vs $405.72
- Up to 45% cheaper
- Up to 29% better value in Atomfall – $1.17 vs $1.64/FPS
- Up to 29% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i7-14700K
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-2600 vs Core i7-14700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-2600
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
192 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
78%
Price, $
$224.8
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$405.72
55%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
71%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600 vs Core i7-14700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600 vs Core i7-14700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2600 Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
