Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2090 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 22% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 2600 - 208 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 28 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $140.00 vs $259.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-14700F - $0.82 vs $1.25 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
66%
Price, $
$259.99
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 225 minutes ago
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-14700F | vs | Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 6 |
28 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |