In Atomfall, the Core i7-14700F is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $15 more expensive!
Core i7-14700F
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 242 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 months and 30 days newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 08, 2024
- Is 11 months and 30 days newer
- Up to 5% cheaper – $288.00 vs $302.97
- Up to 5% cheaper
- Up to 6% better value in Atomfall – $1.17 vs $1.25/FPS
- Up to 6% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-14700F vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
242 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
99%
Price, $
$302.97
95%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
94%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-14700F vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-14700F vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
88%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
91%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
98%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$359.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
