Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-14700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-14700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 83 days older than the cheaper Core i7-14700F.
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $269.99 vs $433.00
- Up to 37% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-14900K - $0.90 vs $1.42 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-14700F - 306 vs 300 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700F - 32 vs 28 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
300
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $269.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Buy for $433 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-14700F | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 24 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |