Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4271 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 26% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770 - 217 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-3770
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $92.09 vs $273.18
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-14700F - $0.54 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
43%
Price, $
$273.18
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $273.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5005 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
172
79%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$92.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $92.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5006 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-14700F | vs | Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |