Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 734 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-12400 - 209 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 28 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $143.57 vs $273.18
- Up to 44% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-14700F - $0.74 vs $1.31 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
56%
Price, $
$273.18
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $273.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6439 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
194
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $143.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6440 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-14700F | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 6 |
28 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |