In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-13700T is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-13700T
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 173 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-13700T vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
173 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.3
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-13700T vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-13700T vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-13700T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-13700T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $384.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
