Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 18% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-10700F - 211 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $224.00 vs $293.24
- Up to 10% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-13700KF - $1.25 vs $1.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
211
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
90%
Price, $
$293.24
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for $293.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
85%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$224
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $224 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-13700KF | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |