In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-13700H is slightly slower than the Xeon X5670. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-13700H
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 45 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5670
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 194 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-13700H vs Xeon X5670: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-13700H vs Xeon X5670 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-13700H vs Xeon X5670 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-13700H
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Xeon X5670
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
43%
L3 Cache
12 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-13700H Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5670 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $502.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1744 | Socket | LGA1366 |
45W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5200 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
