In Atomfall, the Core i7-13700F is faster than the Xeon X5680. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-13700F
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 240 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Feb 14, 2010
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Xeon X5680
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-13700F vs Xeon X5680: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-13700F vs Xeon X5680 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-13700F vs Xeon X5680 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Xeon X5680
Feb 14th, 2010
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5680 Feb 14th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Feb 14th, 2010 |
| $359.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
