In Deathloop, the Core i7-13700F is slightly faster than the Xeon E5620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-13700F
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop – 237 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Xeon E5620
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-13700F vs Xeon E5620: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-13700F vs Xeon E5620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-13700F vs Xeon E5620 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
51%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $359.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
