In Rust, the Core i7-13700F is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-13700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285K
- Up to 7% faster in Rust – 288 vs 269 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Rust
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jan 04, 2023
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-13700F vs Core Ultra 9 285K: Comparison of performance and price
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
288 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$505.16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
100%
![Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Tetracosa-core [24 Core] 3.70 GHz Processor - OEM Pack - Box](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0DFKC99VL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-13700F vs Core Ultra 9 285K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-13700F vs Core Ultra 9 285K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
67%
L3 Cache
30 MB
83%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
91%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
88%
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$359.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1851 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
