In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-13700F is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-13700F
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 170 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 2 years and 9 days newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Jan 04, 2023
- Is 2 years and 9 days newer
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-13700F vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-13700F vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-13700F vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
67%
L3 Cache
30 MB
83%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
96%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
88%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| $359.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
