Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-13700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-13700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 369 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-13700F.
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $267.00 vs $512.79
- Up to 47% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-14900F - $0.90 vs $1.69 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-13700F - 304 vs 298 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700F - 32 vs 24 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $267 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
304
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
53%
Price, $
$512.79
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $512.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-13700F | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |