In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-13700F is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-13700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i7-14700K
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 170 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 9 months and 12 days newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 04, 2023
- Is 9 months and 12 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-13700F vs Core i7-14700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
170 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
100%
Price, $
$405.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-13700F vs Core i7-14700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-13700F vs Core i7-14700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
80%
L3 Cache
30 MB
91%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
93%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$359.00 | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
